Yes, thank you! And even if he is "just like that" all the time, that doesn't mean anyone should have to put themselves through being around/associated with him, if they can avoid it.

If he truly "can't help himself", then he should be removed from society for the safety of others.

and seriously, if he can’t help himself does he need some sort of mental health treatment? If he literally can’t control himself someone needs to get him some help.

To play the jerk's advocate, wouldn't it be feasible that there's a medical condition that makes one jerk by default, but lets him crank the niceness level up at the cost of spoons, and he doesn't got spoons for the whole day?

That's not a medical condition, that's the human condition. We all have finite capacity. We all get frustrated when it runs low. But there are patterns to what people do when that happens.

I'm not arguing for the search of such a condition. It probably doesn't exist. My point is, the structure of your argument might be a wee bit problematic, because it rhymes with popular if ill-advised justifications of oppressing people with well-known, well-documented medical problems. Such as people who can sometimes, for a little while, raise up from their wheelchairs and take a couple of steps.

The endpoint of your argument I agree with, but I'd prefer to get there without lending support and credence to the Patriarchy's notions of "non-standard people" on the way.

@riley @williampietri Yeah. It's not "the Human Condition," it's a matter of neurotype, that's the Allistic Human Condition.
.
It's the model their whole world is built on, and the thing Sapolsky described about stress, when you have to take it from above, you survive it by passing it on down.
.
It's not universal enough to be the entire Human Condition - but it's not rare enough to be an "illness."
So, neurotype.