THE CASE FOR SHUNNING
So thereās this comic strip called Dilbert that a lot of people used to think was funnyācertainly enough to sustain an enormously successful career in the funny pages for its creator, whose name is Scott Adams.
I read Dilbert occasionally back in the dayāthat is in the 1990s. I thought it was pretty funny, I think. Itās hard to remember.
The Reframe
The Case For ShunningPeople like Scott Adams claim they're being silenced. But what they actually seem to object to is being understood.
The central message of Dilbert is that everybody is stupid except you, if Iām remembering correctly.
Itās a popular message.
Anyway, time passed as time does and before you knew it, it wasnāt the 1990s anymore. Eventually social media happened to us all, and we all got to find out that Dilbert creator Scott Adams is a massive bigot and a reactionary crank.
We've known for at least a decade now that Dilbert creator Scott Adams sure does seem to believe the central message of Dilbert.
Heās very impressed by his own lack of stupidity, and also very impressed by what he perceives as the extreme stupidity of almost everyone else. Heās not impressed by much else. Heās mostly skeptical.
Heās skeptical about the science, for one thing. What science? All of it, as far as I can tell.
Heās skeptical about climate catastrophe, and doesnāt believe itās caused by human activity, even though we are now in the midst of a rolling series of climate catastrophes.
Heās skeptical about the existence of anti-Black and anti-trans and anti-woman bigotry, even though he has claimed to believe that Black people have a natural lower average IQ than other races, and that women are not as naturally well-suited to technical fields as men, and that atavistic discomfort is a natural and perfectly understandable reaction for a person to have when they see a trans person.
Heās skeptical about the severity of the Covid pandemic, which has claimed millions of lives.
Adams is proudly a skeptic on all of these matters, and as a general rule, which is unsurprising; skepticism is a common posture among those who believe that reality must be mediated through and approved by them in order to be deemed real by the rest of us.
Again, Adamsā authority for positioning himself an arbiter of reality is that he created Dilbert, which looks like it was drawn by a modestly talented 11-year old, and has in recent years incorporated anti-diversity and anti-trans material.
Itās worth noting that Scott Adams the creator of Dilbert is not a climate scientist, or an expert in the fields of racial or gender studiesāwhich are areas of studies the teaching of which are being criminalized as felonies in the state of Florida.
Nor is he a medical professional dedicated to the latest developments in transgender treatment, or an epidemiologistāareas of study so rich and deep and complex that smart people devote their lives to understanding them.
Nevertheless, all these experts have committed the regrettable sin of not being convincing enough to Scott Adams the creator of the Dilbert comic strip, who cannot draw hands as far as I can tell.
But the skepticism of Scott Adams creator of Dilbert does have its limits.
@JuliusGoat@mastodon.social
He is not skeptical about Donald Trump, who is the former President of the United States and who is also one of the most profoundly ignorant and grotesquely obvious scam artists of the century. And he's not skeptical about most conspiracy theories that question the science.
The thing that seems to make Adams skeptical is credible evidence. Wherever credible evidence exists, heās skeptical of it; where it is absent, he is a believer.
Itās a sort of upside-down worldview, unless you realize that it reflects exactly the sort of rhetorical conditions that would be necessary for the creator of a crudely-drawn comic strip to be accepted as an arbiter of reality.
But now something apparently brand new has happened. Creator of Dilbert Scott Adams took to the YouTube airwaves and decided to go on a very racist tirade indeed.
And now his strip is being pulled from newspapers.
Hereās how it happened.
Thereās a saying that is very popular among white supremacists and neo Nazis and other far right bigots, and that saying is this: āItās OK to be white.ā Itās a catchphrase of theirs, which tries to position people deemed āwhiteā as an oppressed minority, which they are not.
And thereās a right-wing polling company called Rasmussen, who decided, for some reason theyād probably like us all to pretend is unknowable, to ask people whether or not they agree with the statement āitās OK to be whiteāāwhich is, again, a white supremacist catchphrase.
Apparently only about half of Black Americans polled agreed with the phrase, which strikes me as a pretty high level of acceptance, and which probably only shows the degree to which Black Americans are aware that this is a catchphrase among white supremacists.
Dilbert creator Scott Adams got into the Rasmussen crosstabs and found this little tidbit, and proceeded to have a decidedly non-skeptical meltdown about it.
He decided to not know that āitās OK to be whiteā is a white supremacist catchphrase (or at least he decided not to mention it).
He then proclaimed that this data point means that Black people are a hate group, and advocated that white people stay the hell away from Black people, and he said some other racist things, too, which is the sort of thing he does from time to time.
So now he's cancelled I guess.
Scott Adams (creator of Dilbert) seems surprised that there are consequences for him having said the exact sort of horrible things heās been saying for so long without consequence.
Thatās fair. Iām also surprised.
John Hiner is the VP of content for MLive Media Group, and he is quoted as saying āMLive has zero tolerance for racism,ā which is a sort of funny thing for somebody to say when they have for so long been publishing the work of openly racist Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert.
