Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001282

In a recent @TrendsEcolEvo paper, Muff et al. suggested to use the wording "weak/moderate/strong/very strong evidence" instead of binary yes/no p-values. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534721002846
This article was met by some controversy, such as from @lakens https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534721003414?via%3Dihub , by Hartig&Barraquand https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534722000489?via%3Dihub as well by Amrhein&Greenland https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169534722000246?via%3Dihub . In my opinion, Dushoff et al. present a nice alternative - referring statistical clarity https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2041-210X.13159

FFS