it is not ai c:
i had to check bc i forgort that actuate is a word, the cable in front of the middle monitor kinda blurs into the chassis, and, while the labels on the function keys are coherent, the (again) middle terminal's keyboard kinda looks like it has a chiseled key at the bottom of it's second column, unlike the visible board in front. bottom row is weird in general, mostly that's normal for the era but some of the dark marks are suspect

while there's a lot of evidence for the image existing well into the early oughts, i couldn't find any other examples at nearly this fidelity until last December. that's recent enough that even a fresh scan could plausibly have been upscaled with AI, but i don't think this one was -- many sml letters and not one out of place.

i share my inspection regardless bc it is illustrative of the level of skepticism and vigilance that must be employed by those participating in the maintenance of anti-ai norms c: